
Browse Items (8239 total)
Sort by:
-
"Test Laboratory monthly progress report" July.
Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates July 1st through July 31st, 1967. -
"Test Laboratory monthly progress report" June.
Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates June 1st through June 31st, 1967. -
"Test Laboratory monthly progress report" October.
Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates October 1st through October 31st, 1967. Page 17 missing. -
"Test Laboratory monthly progress report" September.
Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates September 1st through September 31st, 1967. -
"Test Laboratory progress report" Febuary and March.
Monthly rogress report for the test laboratory regarding the Saturn 1B program between Feburary and March -
"Test Laboratory progress report" March and April.
Monthly rogress report for the test laboratory regarding the Saturn 1B program between March and April. -
"Test Laboratory progress report" May and June.
Monthly rogress report for the test laboratory regarding the Saturn 1B program between Feburary and March -
"Test operations:" Organization Chart.
Organization Chart of the North American Rockwell Test Operations. -
"Test procedure validation by computer simulation."
Digital computer simulation of the Saturn I Instrument Unit electrical networks was accomplished using the Discrete Network Simulation programs. The schematics were analyzed and a logic model prepared which consisted of a series of Boolean equations. The test procedures, which are written in the Acceptance, Test, or Launch Language (ATOLL), consist of a sequential set of computer instructions for the RCA llOA checkout computer to control the operation of the electrical networks. The procedures also contain the predicted results for each operation. The driving functions for the simulation of the model are generated from the ATOLL test tape by the Input Generator Program. The time sequenced operation of the networks is indicatedby the output from the simulation program in addition to the number of times each component in the system changes state. The results of the simulation are compared to the test procedure predictions on the ATOLL tape by the Comparator Program and any differences are listed. The Comparator Program also lists any component which did not change state at least once.