UAH Archives, Special Collections, and Digital Initiatives

Browse Items (1965 total)

  • Binder3_051208093544.pdf

    The report includes the Systems Test Division; Components and Subsystems Division; Technical Support Division; and the Advanced Facilities Planning Office.
  • TestlabMON_JAN_062308120607.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates January 1st through January 31st, 1968.
  • Testlabmonprogrep_041008104724.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates September 1st through September 31st, 1967.
  • TestlabmonproJUNE_032808134023.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates June 1st through June 31st, 1967.
  • Testlabmontprogrep_021108103845.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates April 1st through April 31st, 1967. Last page of document is missing.
  • Testlabomontprog_011608112625.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates Febuary 1st through Febuary 31st, 1967.
  • TEstlabprogrep2_031008111252.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates August 1st through August 31st, 1967.
  • TEstlabprogrep3_032408084650.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates July 1st through July 31st, 1967.
  • TestlabprogrepDEC_051408095158.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates December 1st through December 31st, 1967.
  • TestlabprogrepOCT_041808091527.pdf

    Laboratory monthly progress report for the Saturn 1B program between dates October 1st through October 31st, 1967. Page 17 missing.
  • Monthproreport_012508092248.pdf

    Monthly progress report for March, 1967.
  • monprorep_021208122316.pdf
  • SatVnsproclauvehgrosuppequip_042108143716.pdf

    The functions, authority, management relationships, and responsibilities of the Launch Vehicle Ground Support Equipment Project Office are described. Functions and examples of non-stage procured Launch Vehicle Ground Support Equipment (LVGSE) are described and illustrated.
  • michassefacimisstestfacivolIII4thedit_081307114941.pdf

    This document is the fourth edition of the management charts and photographs maintained in the Management Information Office of the Executive Staff on Michoud Assembly Facility and Mississippi Test Facility. Information on other MSFC activities and facilities will be published in separate volumes.
  • spc_nick_000467_000469.pdf

    Gibson writes in reference to Bell's defense of Colonel John C. Nickerson, Jr. Gibson mentions comparable cases and his experience with similar situations.
  • Memoforgeneostr_112508122002.pdf

    Memorandum regarding a potential cost estimate for operational versions of the Saturn C1 and C2.
  • Memoforpres_111808164031.pdf

    Memorandum discussing the responsibilities intended to be given to the President regarding certain space-related activities.
  • Memofortheadmin_120108115227.pdf

    Very poor photocopy. Memorandum requesting additional information regarding a file attached to this one.
  • Memomrhorn_120108135158.pdf

    Memorandum discussing possibilities of obtaining or reallocating funding to speed up the 'super booster' program.
  • spc_stnv_000035.pdf
  • spc_spac_000189_000202.pdf

    The pamphlet advertises the portable and the permanent Skyliner chairlift to "park and carnival owners, independent ride operators and fair management."
  • engrsafeintomissspacsyst_070507103305.pdf

    Safety Engineering, as applied to complex missile and space systems, has developed a new methodology referred to as "System Safety Engineering." The requirement for a comprehensive approach to safety which is included as a contractually covered adjunct to the design, development, and operational phases of a systems life cycle has become apparent from costly missile mishap experience. The general concepts and accomplishments of this new engineering discipline are described along with possible beneficial relationships with Reliability and other recognized organizational elements engaged in safety related activities.
  • usessaturn_071607093947.pdf

    Saturn and Apollo hardware will not have realized their ultimate potential for space exploration after the project lunar landing is complete. To accomplish the Apollo lunar landing program, an immense backlog of technology, facilities, and booster capability will have been built up, and we believe proper utilization of this resource will fill the needs for planetary, lunar and earth orbital space exploration for years to come.
  • survpropprob_060607132313.pdf

    Incomplete document. Displays errors in space-vehicle design as they relate to space travel.
  • oppeurpaylsatveh_071907142613.pdf

    Prepared for presentation to the Eurospace Conference. In this paper, we will not deal with the first two questions, which must be of interest to every potential experimenter, but only with the last question of vehicle availability.
  • Highenermissforsatur_091307144922.pdf

    Presented to Society of Automotive Engineers, Advanced Launch Vehicle & Propulsion Systems. When the Apollo lunar landing project is complete, the Saturn and Apollo hardware will only have begun to realize their ultimate potential for space exploration. The immense reserve of Apollo technology, facilities, and booster capability can then be directed to the achievement of national goals which lie far beyond the initial lunar landing. In achieving the Apollo lunar objectives, large investments will have been made in launch facilities, tracking systems, propulsion techniques, reentry systems, lunar landing systems and rendezvous technologies. Although developnent in these specialized areas has been tailored to the needs of Apollo, numerous studies by NASA and industry have demonstrated the feasibility of using the spacecraft, launch vehicles, and operating techniques for missions far more complex than lunar landings. Amortization of this hardware will prove cost-effective for missions of more sophisticated applications.
  • EvolstepsinS-IVBdevelopment_061708170306.pdf

    The injection stage of a multistage launch vehicle must be partially a velocity stage and partially a spacecraft; it must not only boost the payload, it must also perform cooperative mission operations with the payload after orbital insertion. These hybrid requirements result in intrinsic stage versatility which permits consideration of new and challenging missions for the stage which were unanticipated during initial design.; Prepared by T. J. Gordon, Director, Advance Space Stations and Planetary Systems, Space Systems Center, Douglas Aircraft Company, Huntington Beach, California.
  • minimax_081607145436.pdf

    Keith D. Graham is principal mathematician, Systems and Research Center, Honeywell, Inc., 2345 Walnut Street, St. Paul, Minnesota.; Work done under NASA contract NAS 8-11206 from the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center.; ABSTRACT: A method of specifying the gains of a linear controller for a large launch booster using a new application of optimal control theory is described in this paper. Results for a specific example are included. An important control requirement is to maintain cost variables (such as bending moment, engine gimbal deflection, and lateral deviation from desired trajectory) within specified limits in the presence of load disturbances. This requirement is met by using a performance index which depends explicitly on maximum achievable values of the cost variables in a finite time interval.
  • Paylintespacexpe_092607134251.pdf

    Space experimentation requires an increasingly complex planning and systems engineering effort to meet the demand for highest precision and reliability of all measurements and observations. A companion paper discusses the interfaces between the scientific/technical areas of space experimentation and the instruments, subsystems and support systems within the spacecraft. This paper deals with the organization and the procedures which are needed to perform the difficult payload integration process for space experimentation. In the course of this process it is necessary to define the experiments completely, to describe all instruments in terms of engineering specifications, to investigate the commonality of equipment, to group the experiments into mission compatible payloads, to specify acceptable loads on all subsystems and astronauts (when present) and to plan for all contingencies during the flight.
  • techrpts_051107091113.pdf

    Bibliography of technical reports from 1957-1963
  • Friday__October_27__2017_at_12_12_20_PM_default_1fcc37b7.mp4

    Bran Griffin was born in Medford, Oregon. His father was in the military, so they moved around a lot. Bran went to the University of Texas his first year of college, and he studied Architecture. Then, he graduated college with a degree in Architecture from Washington State University. He then went to graduate scholl in Southern California, and he received a fine arts degree. After this, Bran wanted to get a degree in something a little more stable, so he went back to school to get his master's degree in Architecture. After this, Bran was on a shuttleship for a couple of years in Rome, and then he came back to start his career in teaching Architecture. Even though he was teaching Architecture, he had an intense passion for space. Because of this passion, he started to become involved with the Johnson Space Center with a faculty fellowship. Bran was in their Spacecraft Design Division. Since he wanted to be closer to be a part of the Space Industry, he decided to move to Washington State. After a while of working in Washington State, he received a job offer from Boeing in Hunstville, AL and began his career there being involved with the space station.
  • phiandpraofrelasappinthedesofthesatinssys_013008103714.pdf

    The basic engineering approach used in the Saturn instrumentation system has evolved to provide a highly reliable design for short periods of operation. The airborne measuring and telemetry systems including preflight tests, inspection, documentation, and feedback between the users and designers are discussed. The apparent differences between the practice and theory of reliability are rationalized. Some consideration is given to new problems in designing systems that must operate in hostile environments for long periods. The potential contribution of redundancy as a design concept is discussed.; This paper is concerned with the airborne measuring and telemetry systems; it does not attempt to treat the entire Saturn instrumentation system which consists of tracking devices including optical, radar, and Doppler, plus television, film cameras, and a myriad of instruments connected with factory checkout, ground test, and launch.
  • liqrockeng.pdf

    This paper presents a discussion on liquid propellant rocket engines. The first part contains a discussion on liquid propellants, including a description of various propellant types such as cryogenic, storable,bipropellant, and monopropellant. This part also points out desirable physical properties and includes a section on performance outlining the methods by which performance is calculated and shows performance for various liquid rocket propellant combinations.
  • spc_spac_000350_000351.pdf
  • TheNASAGrumApol_052410121955.pdf

    Handwritten in pencil on the document. Describes the layout and function of various sections of the Apollo lunar module.
  • StruoftheNASA_052410122627.pdf

    Describes the structure and function of each part of the NASA Lunar Module
  • ManuhistLM5_052510151514.pdf

    Essay that focuses on the achievements of the Grumman Aerospace Corporation.
  • LMSystDesc_052410121822.pdf

    Report that describes the major systems of the Lunar Module.
  • Deveofthenasagrum_052510145157.pdf

    Paper regarding the actions and achievement of the Grumman Aerospace Corporation.
  • sdsp_skyl_000061_001.pdf
Output Formats

atom, csv, dc-rdf, dcmes-xml, json, omeka-xml, rss2